Advertisement

ABSTRACTS

Summer 2010 — Volume 39, Number 2

The Public Manager JournalFEATURE

 

Aligning Training with Priority Outcomes at NPS

Irene Connelly

 

In 2006, the National Park Service’s (NPS) Park Facility Management Division jump-started an aggressive, competency-based training program—the Facility Manager Leaders Program (FMLP)—designed to develop the next generation of leaders in the maintenance field. By applying industry standards and using expertise from within and outside NPS, training managers designed a program that met the agency’s succession requirements while implementing a major change in park management culture.

The program’s exceptional record of success earned it the 2010 winner of the W. Edwards Deming Outstanding Training Award.

 

Irene Connelly is a senior editor in the department of communications and marketing at the Graduate School. Contact her at irene.connelly@graduateschool.edu.

 

The Changing Workplace

People

Strengthening Our Civic Skills

Peter Levine

 

On April 29, 2010, 75 scholars, civic leaders, and federal officials met in Washington, D.C., to develop a federal policy agenda for civic skills. The conference was convened by the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement at Tufts University’s Jonathan M. Tisch College of Citizenship and Public Service. It was co-sponsored by the Campaign for the Civic Mission of Schools and Strengthening Our Nation’s Democracy.

 

Peter Levine is director of research and director of the Center for Information& Research on Civic Learning & Engagement (CIRCLE) at the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Citizenship and Public Service, Tufts University in Medford, Massachusetts. Contact him at Peter.Levine@Tufts.edu and www.activecitizen.tufts.edu. This article was jointly developed with the staff of CIRCLE at Tufts University, which studies the civic engagement of young Americans. CIRCLE has been funded by the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Pew Charitable Trusts, and the Corporation for National and Community Service, among others. CIRCLE’s research is collected at www.civicyouth.org.

 

Budgets

Primer for Budgeting Federal Labor Costs

Thad Juszczak

 

Labor costs (salary and benefit costs) for federal civilian employees often constitute a substantial portion of an agency’s budget, typically exceeding 50 percent of its total budget. Even for those agencies that have considerable amounts of contract or grant funding, labor costs are an important part of the budget. Once an agency hires someone, there is a continuing requirement to pay that person until they leave. Many different aspects of federal salaries and benefits can make budgeting accurate labor costs complicated, especially when an agency has thousands of civilian employees. Here are some factors that agencies should consider when budgeting labor costs.

 

Thad Juszczak is a director with Grant Thornton LLP. He is a retired federal budget official and now consults on budgeting and performance management issues with such organizations as the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department Agriculture, NASA, and Yale University. Contact him at Thad.Juszczak@gt.com.

 

Technology

Government Workforce of the Future

Marnie E. Green

 

Agencies—regardless of size or mission—must respond immediately to four new, yet critical, technology trends. Hundreds of reports are published annually documenting shifts in workforce trends. Each year, the list of trends seems to include the same themes: diversity, globalization, aging workforce, and economic impacts. These trends are predictable and often not clearly actionable for most public agencies.

 

Marnie Green is a principal consultant of the Management Education Group, a training and consulting firm specializing in developing confidence in public sector leaders. Green is the author of Painless Performance Evaluations: A Practical Approach to Managing Day-to-Day Employee Performance. Contact her at mgreen@managementeducationgroup.com.

 

Learning

Service-Learning: Part I

Linda Kiltz

 

The weak economy will continue to cause great fiscal distress among state and local governments around the nation. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, at least 48 states have addressed or are facing shortfalls in their budgets for the new fiscal year totaling $194 billion or 28 percent of state budgets. The estimated state budget gap is $180 billion for 2011 and $118 billion and for 2012. In response to budget shortfalls, many state and local governments have enacted tax and fee increases and taken measures to implement budget cuts through workforce reductions—canceling capital infrastructure projects and reducing services to citizens.

 

Linda Kiltz, PhD, is assistant professor of public administration in the master of public administration program at Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi. Kiltz received her PhD in public administration and policy from Portland State University in 2008. Her areas of expertise are in public administration and management, homeland security policy, emergency management, and terrorism. She has more than 20 years experience working in local, state, and federal government organizations, including six years in the U.S. Army and eight years in law enforcement and emergency management. Contact her at Linda.Kiltz@tamucc.edu.

 

Articles

Strategic Workplace Learning

Integrated Learning in New York State Government

Nancy Y. Nee

 

Today’s workplace learning still tends to mirror this one-way teaching approach in which education focuses on the mechanics of a concept rather than how it should be applied on the job. And employees typically are taught in a one-size-fits-all manner, as if they all are at the same stage of comprehension and ability. By leveraging an integrated learning framework, organizations can develop a training and performance program that helps employees apply learning immediately, teaches workers how to share and transfer knowledge effectively, and aligns learning initiatives with overall business objectives.

 

Nancy Y. Nee, PMP, CBAP, CSM, is executive director of project management and business analysis programs at ESI International, which provides thought leadership in these fields while incorporating the industry’s best practices and professional advances into ESI’s portfolio of related courses and services. She is certified as a Project Management Professional from PMI, Certified Business Analysis Professional from the IIBA, and a Certified Scrum Master from the Scrum Alliance. Contact her at nnee@esi-intl.com.

 

Scenario-Based Learning Improves Trooper Performance

Ernest "Bub" Kovacs and William Toms

 

In 1999, the New Jersey State Police (NJSP) entered into a consent decree with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to amend its patrol, accountability, and training practices throughout the entire organization as an alternative to impending litigation. NJSP, in agreeing to develop evidence-based training that is benchmarked to national best practices, created a system to link training development and delivery directly to the desired performance of its police services.

 

Ernest “Bub” Kovacs, EdD, is an assistant professor of administrative science at Fairleigh Dickinson University where he teaches courses in leadership, human resources management, and organizational change. He is the lead instructor for the New Jersey Certified Public Manager Program. Contact him at kovacs@fdu.edu. William Toms, EdD, retired from the New Jersey State Police as a major, where among other responsibilities he was commandant of the training academy. He is an adjunct faculty member at Fairleigh Dickinson University and has a consulting practice working with both public and private organizations. Contact him at bill@thetomsprofessionalgroup.com.

 

Making Training Strategic

Preston "Tim" Brown

 

To make training more strategic within government agencies, it must be part of a larger plan or method that helps our organizations achieve a specific goal. Goals are established by the agency’s strategic and performance plans and are further elaborated in the workforce plan, as well as various business plans.

 

Preston “Tim” Brown is a manager in the organizational improvement practice for Grant Thornton LLP; tim.brown@gt.com.

 

Human Capital Management

Executive Coaching: Leadership Development in the Federal Government

Richard "Rick" Koonce

 

The federal government is suffering from a serious leadership deficit, and that deficit has only grown in recent years given the challenges facing the United States. That’s the major headline to emerge from a recent report published by the Partnership for Public Service (PPS) in conjunction with consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH). The report, Unrealized Vision: Reimagining the Senior Executive Service, examines the state of the government’s senior leadership corps 31 years after its creation.

 

Richard (Rick) Koonce is a certified executive coach and consultant based in Boston. He is the co-author of Growing Leaders (ASTD, 2001) and of many articles on the topics of leadership and change. His clients include corporations, nonprofit organizations, NGOs, government agencies, and consulting firms. Koonce is a member of the International Coach Federation and serves on the Board of Directors of The Public Manager. Reach him at 413.695.5032 or at www.richardkoonce.com.

 

Bridging the Skills Gap: Part II

Pat Galagan

 

Part I of this series (Winter 2009/2010) defined a skills gap as a significant fissure between an organization's current capabilities and the skills it needs to achieve its mission and goals. Part II will examine skills gaps facing the federal government and how some agencies are addressing them. Bridging the Skills Gap, a white paper based on research by the American Society for Training & Development (ASTD), identified two underlying causes of widespread skills gaps in the United States: jobs today require more knowledge work, more teamwork, and more use of technology than in the past and educational attainment has fallen behind the nation’s need for skilled workers.

 

Pat Galagan is executive editor for ASTD. Contact her at pgalagan@astd.org.

 

Performance Management

Strategies to Improve Government Performance

Jonathan D. Breul

 

Four senior U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) officials—who are leading the Obama Administration’s management efforts—recently discussed their game plan and top priorities at the 49th annual Interagency Resources Management Conference (IRMCO) conference, convened this April in Cambridge, Maryland. This year, the opening plenary panel entitled “Expanding on the Management Agenda” was a conversation with the four senior OMB officials driving the Obama Administration’s approach to improving government performance.

 

Jonathan D. Breul is executive director of the IBM Center for the Business of Government; jonathan.d.breul@us.ibm.com.

 

The Performance Imperative

John M. Mullins

 

Many public opinion polls tracking federal government performance note that while there are pockets of improvement, the overall assessment is government does not work the way it should or how citizens expect. The gap between what is expected and what is actually done breaks down trust between the government and those governed. Numerous polls can be referenced to support this assessment, but the president’s assertion acknowledges the gap and sets a new bar for performance: “to spend wisely, reform bad habits, and to do our business in the light of the day. These three actions will go a long way to ensure the vital trust between a people and their government.”

 

John. M. Mullins is vice president of performance solutions for Proofpoint Systems Inc., a software company that helps improve organization and human performance. Mullins has spent more than 25 years in both federal service and the private sector consulting on organization and human performance. Additionally, he served as an examiner for the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award program. Contact him at john.mullins@proofpoint.net.

 

Budget & Financial Management

Revisiting User Fees in Challenging Fiscal Times

David L. Baker

 

The findings of the International City/County Management Association’s 2009 State of the Profession Survey (covering 2,214 cities and counties) demonstrate widespread user fee interest. Among various fiscal strategies, 46 percent of local agencies surveyed reported an increase in user fees, while 23 percent added new fees. With such broad based activity, the advantages and disadvantages of user fees warrant reexamination as public managers wrestle with wavering revenues.

 

David L. Baker is an associate professor of public administration at California State University, San Bernardino; dbaker@csusb.edu.

 

Preventing and Detecting Fraud, Waste, and Abuse

John Moore

 

The passage and implementation of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and distribution of more than $700 billion in funds to federal, state, county, and city governments and agencies by the Obama Administration has highlighted the role of public administrators in preventing and detecting fraud, waste, and abuse in government programs. Now more than ever, public administrators are at the forefront of ensuring that citizens are receiving the most “bang for buck” for their tax money used by government entities. Public administrators encounter significant challenges to safeguarding taxpayers’ money: budget constraints, technology developments, and the fertile imagination of those who seek to defraud the system.

 

John Moore is currently the director of regulatory integrity for the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC). He oversees the division that works to prevent and detect fraud, waste, and abuse in the 30 federal and state programs administered by the agency. Moore, an attorney, has also served as the deputy general counsel and general counsel for TWC. Prior to coming to the commission, he worked at the Texas State Board of Insurance, the Texas House of Representatives, the Texas Treasury, the Teachers Retirement System of Texas, and the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy. Moore is a graduate of the University of Missouri at Columbia and the University of Texas at Austin School of Law. He will be an adjunct professor at Texas State University in the masters of public administration program in fall 2010. Contact him at john.moore@twc.state.tx.us.

 

Departments

Commentary

American Government 3.0

Terry F. Buss

 

Before the election of Barack Obama and the global financial crisis that soon followed, many pundits, scholars, and practitioners believed that “the era of big government was over.” Government was becoming smaller, more nimble, and less hierarchical. It was oriented toward efficient and effective service provision, market-based approaches, performance management, and evidence-based policy. It increasingly employed outsourcing, partnerships, collaboration, deregulation, and citizen engagement. It relied more on IT solutions such as e-government and knowledge management. In short, we were witnessing an evolution into American Governance 2.0.

 

Terry F. Buss, PhD, is executive director of and distinguished professor of public policy at the Heinz College of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University in Adelaide, Australia. Contact him at tbuss@andrew.cmu.edu.

 

Book Review

Making Measures Work

William E. Baker

 

Leading Performance Management: In Local Government, edited by David Ammons, informs readers on how many local governments have matured to the point of taking the next step: performance management. Managing performance measurements is the vital link between vision and mission aspirations and actual outcomes that demonstrate whether goals and objectives have been accomplished. This link is an important focus for educating future leaders of public administration.

 

William E. Baker, PhD, is assistant professor of public administration and intern advisor at Kennesaw State University. Prior to his academic position, he worked in local government for more than 30 years. Contact him at wbaker@kennesaw.edu

 

The Uncivil Servant

Reconciliation

Grimaldi

 

To many people, the term reconciliation means to no longer oppose, to acquiescence, or to win over to friendliness. Likewise, many people would not be surprised to learn that none of these meanings square with the reconciliation process recently engaged in by Congress. If reconciliation were employed in other walks of life, how would it look? What issues would be reconciled?